TeraCopy works great for large-file transfers where speed and resumption are priorities. However, I suggest integrating it with the Explorer shell but NOT using it as the default copy handler in Windows. Great program, and these newer versions are a bit more polished than the program has been in the past. If you're not interested in advice based upon this experience, you don't have to take it. And I've done so on more than a handful of machines. I'm telling you that I've seen this problem before, and I've fixed this problem before. There is no way TeraCopy or any other software (that doesn't interface directly with your network hardware) could cause it to drop if it wasn't already having problems, whether you were aware of these problems previously or not. I'd use it if TeraCopy didn't work fine for me and for all of my friends in the industry, but it does.Īll I'm saying is that if ANY activity is causing your wireless adapter to drop a connection, there's something wrong with your networking subsystem.
If SuperCopier works for you, that's great! I've found it to be consistently ~20% slower than TeraCopy with large file transfers and to generally have a clunkier interface because it uses a LOT of legacy code, but I like it. It just has fewer faults than the available alternatives. I'd never claim TeraCopy didn't have its share of problems. It's not about it being the program's "fault" or not.
0 kommentar(er)
